|
|
|
|
LEADER |
05487caa a2200949 4500 |
001 |
0-1676020233 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20220116180634.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
190905s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||afr c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.4102/ve.v40i1.1959
|2 doi
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1676020233
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1676020233
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a afr
|
084 |
|
|
|a 1
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Beukes, Johann
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Policraticus en Metalogicon
|b ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018
|c Johann Beukes
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c [2019]
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a Policraticus and Metalogicon: Updating the Saresberiensis-research, 2013-2018. This article provides an overview of the philosophical outputs of John of Salisbury (ca. 1115-1180), with reference to his two main philosophical texts, Policraticus and Metalogicon (both circulated in 1159). After presenting current research challenges in Medieval philosophy, Salisbury is presented as an example of a 'non-canonised' figure in Medieval philosophy; one who is throughly researched in his niche compartment, but remains unacknowledged in 'canonised' Medieval philosophy. Few introductions, readers and companions in the discipline give attention to 'non-canonical' thinkers such as Salisbury - yet when the niche research itself comes forward with a remarkable output in a short period of just five years, the 'canon' of Medieval philosophy itself could possibly be challenged. The niche research in Salisbury's case has indeed presented an energetic output over the past few years, which transcends the standardised sources and enriches the discipline. The question lingers: do these combined efforts have the ability to challenge the notion of a 'canonised' Medieval philosophy? Four contributions from the niche scholarship from 2013 to 2018 are henceforth discussed: i) A new translation of Metalogicon (Hall & Haseldine 2013); ii) A research-updated introduction (Grellard & Lachaud 2015), the first of its kind in Salisbury scholarship in more than three decades; iii) A monography (O' Daly 2018, overstating the own case contra Nederman, yet with a stunning Roman premise); and iv) The replacement of the complete Salisbury section in the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Bollermann and Nederman 2016).Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: As a millennium-long discourse, Medieval philosophy functions in a Venn diagrammatical relationship with Medieval history, Church history, patristics and philosophy of religion. Whenever 'mainstream' or 'canonised' Medieval philosophy is impacted from the niche research, it may well have implications that these closely related disciplines could take note of.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Grellard & Lachaud 2015
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Hall & Haseldine 2013
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Irene O'Daly 2018
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a John of Salisbury
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Metalogicon
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Policraticus
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Saresberiensis-Research
|
689 |
0 |
0 |
|D u
|0 (DE-588)7679427-1
|0 (DE-627)702911828
|0 (DE-576)312697236
|a Johannes
|c von Salisbury, Bischof
|d 1115-1180
|t Metalogicon
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
1 |
|D u
|0 (DE-588)4209921-3
|0 (DE-627)105100498
|0 (DE-576)210194782
|a Johannes
|c von Salisbury, Bischof
|d 1115-1180
|t Policraticus
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
2 |
|D s
|0 (DE-588)4045791-6
|0 (DE-627)106200259
|0 (DE-576)209066873
|a Philosophie
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
3 |
|D s
|0 (DE-588)4129108-6
|0 (DE-627)104535474
|0 (DE-576)209607793
|a Mittelalter
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
4 |
|D s
|0 (DE-588)4030720-7
|0 (DE-627)104814403
|0 (DE-576)208988815
|a Kirchengeschichte
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
5 |
|D s
|0 (DE-588)4075933-7
|0 (DE-627)104106484
|0 (DE-576)209200200
|a Patristik
|2 gnd
|
689 |
0 |
|
|5 (DE-627)
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Verbum et ecclesia
|d Pretoria : Univ., 1995
|g 40(2019), 1, Seite 1-14
|h Online-Ressource
|w (DE-627)367636581
|w (DE-600)2116019-3
|w (DE-576)311829287
|x 2074-7705
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:40
|g year:2019
|g number:1
|g pages:1-14
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v40i1.1959
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/1959
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
936 |
u |
w |
|d 40
|j 2019
|e 1
|h 1-14
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/1959
|9 LFER
|
852 |
|
|
|a LFER
|z 2019-09-16T00:00:00Z
|
970 |
|
|
|c OD
|
971 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
972 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
973 |
|
|
|c Aufsatz
|
935 |
|
|
|a lfer
|
950 |
|
|
|a 中世纪
|
950 |
|
|
|a 中世紀
|
950 |
|
|
|a Средневековье
|
950 |
|
|
|a Philosophieren
|
950 |
|
|
|a Philosoph
|
950 |
|
|
|a Philosophin
|
950 |
|
|
|a Geisteswissenschaften
|
950 |
|
|
|a 哲学
|
950 |
|
|
|a 哲學
|
950 |
|
|
|a Философия
|
950 |
|
|
|a Patrologie
|
950 |
|
|
|a Kirchenschriftsteller
|
950 |
|
|
|a Kirchenväter
|
950 |
|
|
|a 古基督教著作研究
|
950 |
|
|
|a 教父学
|
950 |
|
|
|a 教父學
|
950 |
|
|
|a Патристика
|
950 |
|
|
|a Johannes
|
950 |
|
|
|a von Salisbury, Bischof
|
950 |
|
|
|a Policratique
|
950 |
|
|
|a De nugis curialium et vestigiis philosophorum
|
950 |
|
|
|a Kirche
|
950 |
|
|
|a Geschichte
|
950 |
|
|
|a 教会
|
950 |
|
|
|a 历史
|
950 |
|
|
|a 教會
|
950 |
|
|
|a 歷史
|
950 |
|
|
|a История церкви
|
951 |
|
|
|a XA
|
951 |
|
|
|a XA-GB
|
951 |
|
|
|a XA-FR
|
980 |
|
|
|a 1676020233
|b 0
|k 1676020233
|c lfer
|
SOLR
_version_ |
1757963524606263296 |
access_facet |
Electronic Resources |
author |
Beukes, Johann |
author_facet |
Beukes, Johann |
author_role |
aut |
author_sort |
Beukes, Johann |
author_variant |
j b jb |
callnumber-sort |
|
collection |
lfer |
container_reference |
40(2019), 1, Seite 1-14 |
container_title |
Verbum et ecclesia |
contents |
Policraticus and Metalogicon: Updating the Saresberiensis-research, 2013-2018. This article provides an overview of the philosophical outputs of John of Salisbury (ca. 1115-1180), with reference to his two main philosophical texts, Policraticus and Metalogicon (both circulated in 1159). After presenting current research challenges in Medieval philosophy, Salisbury is presented as an example of a 'non-canonised' figure in Medieval philosophy; one who is throughly researched in his niche compartment, but remains unacknowledged in 'canonised' Medieval philosophy. Few introductions, readers and companions in the discipline give attention to 'non-canonical' thinkers such as Salisbury - yet when the niche research itself comes forward with a remarkable output in a short period of just five years, the 'canon' of Medieval philosophy itself could possibly be challenged. The niche research in Salisbury's case has indeed presented an energetic output over the past few years, which transcends the standardised sources and enriches the discipline. The question lingers: do these combined efforts have the ability to challenge the notion of a 'canonised' Medieval philosophy? Four contributions from the niche scholarship from 2013 to 2018 are henceforth discussed: i) A new translation of Metalogicon (Hall & Haseldine 2013); ii) A research-updated introduction (Grellard & Lachaud 2015), the first of its kind in Salisbury scholarship in more than three decades; iii) A monography (O' Daly 2018, overstating the own case contra Nederman, yet with a stunning Roman premise); and iv) The replacement of the complete Salisbury section in the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Bollermann and Nederman 2016).Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: As a millennium-long discourse, Medieval philosophy functions in a Venn diagrammatical relationship with Medieval history, Church history, patristics and philosophy of religion. Whenever 'mainstream' or 'canonised' Medieval philosophy is impacted from the niche research, it may well have implications that these closely related disciplines could take note of. |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)1676020233, (DE-599)KXP1676020233 |
doi_str_mv |
10.4102/ve.v40i1.1959 |
facet_avail |
Online, Free |
facet_local_del330 |
Johannes, Philosophie, Mittelalter, Kirchengeschichte, Patristik |
finc_class_facet |
not assigned |
format |
ElectronicBookComponentPart |
format_access_txtF_mv |
Article, E-Article |
format_de105 |
Ebook |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_detail_txtF_mv |
text-online-monograph-child |
format_dezi4 |
e-Book |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_legacy |
ElectronicBookPart |
format_strict_txtF_mv |
E-Article |
geogr_code |
Europe, United Kingdom, France |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
hierarchy_parent_id |
0-367636581 |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Verbum et ecclesia |
hierarchy_sequence |
40(2019), 1, Seite 1-14 |
hierarchy_top_id |
0-367636581 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Verbum et ecclesia |
id |
0-1676020233 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
imprint |
2019 |
imprint_str_mv |
[2019] |
institution |
DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-14, DE-Zwi2 |
is_hierarchy_id |
0-1676020233 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Policraticus en Metalogicon: ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 |
isil_str_mv |
LFER |
issn |
2074-7705 |
kxp_id_str |
1676020233 |
language |
Afrikaans |
last_indexed |
2023-02-16T05:17:42.431Z |
local_heading_facet_dezwi2 |
Grellard & Lachaud 2015, Hall & Haseldine 2013, Irene O'Daly 2018, John of Salisbury, Metalogicon, Policraticus, Saresberiensis-Research, Johannes, Philosophie, Mittelalter, Kirchengeschichte, Patristik |
marc024a_ct_mv |
10.4102/ve.v40i1.1959 |
match_str |
beukes2019policraticusenmetalogiconbywerkingvandiesaresberiensisnavorsing20132018 |
mega_collection |
Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
misc_de105 |
EBOOK |
multipart_link |
311829287 |
multipart_part |
(311829287)40(2019), 1, Seite 1-14 |
publishDate |
[2019] |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
publishPlace |
|
publisher |
|
record_format |
marcfinc |
record_id |
1676020233 |
recordtype |
marcfinc |
rvk_facet |
No subject assigned |
source_id |
0 |
spelling |
Beukes, Johann VerfasserIn aut, Policraticus en Metalogicon ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 Johann Beukes, [2019], Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, Policraticus and Metalogicon: Updating the Saresberiensis-research, 2013-2018. This article provides an overview of the philosophical outputs of John of Salisbury (ca. 1115-1180), with reference to his two main philosophical texts, Policraticus and Metalogicon (both circulated in 1159). After presenting current research challenges in Medieval philosophy, Salisbury is presented as an example of a 'non-canonised' figure in Medieval philosophy; one who is throughly researched in his niche compartment, but remains unacknowledged in 'canonised' Medieval philosophy. Few introductions, readers and companions in the discipline give attention to 'non-canonical' thinkers such as Salisbury - yet when the niche research itself comes forward with a remarkable output in a short period of just five years, the 'canon' of Medieval philosophy itself could possibly be challenged. The niche research in Salisbury's case has indeed presented an energetic output over the past few years, which transcends the standardised sources and enriches the discipline. The question lingers: do these combined efforts have the ability to challenge the notion of a 'canonised' Medieval philosophy? Four contributions from the niche scholarship from 2013 to 2018 are henceforth discussed: i) A new translation of Metalogicon (Hall & Haseldine 2013); ii) A research-updated introduction (Grellard & Lachaud 2015), the first of its kind in Salisbury scholarship in more than three decades; iii) A monography (O' Daly 2018, overstating the own case contra Nederman, yet with a stunning Roman premise); and iv) The replacement of the complete Salisbury section in the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Bollermann and Nederman 2016).Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: As a millennium-long discourse, Medieval philosophy functions in a Venn diagrammatical relationship with Medieval history, Church history, patristics and philosophy of religion. Whenever 'mainstream' or 'canonised' Medieval philosophy is impacted from the niche research, it may well have implications that these closely related disciplines could take note of., Grellard & Lachaud 2015, Hall & Haseldine 2013, Irene O'Daly 2018, John of Salisbury, Metalogicon, Policraticus, Saresberiensis-Research, u (DE-588)7679427-1 (DE-627)702911828 (DE-576)312697236 Johannes von Salisbury, Bischof 1115-1180 Metalogicon gnd, u (DE-588)4209921-3 (DE-627)105100498 (DE-576)210194782 Johannes von Salisbury, Bischof 1115-1180 Policraticus gnd, s (DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-627)106200259 (DE-576)209066873 Philosophie gnd, s (DE-588)4129108-6 (DE-627)104535474 (DE-576)209607793 Mittelalter gnd, s (DE-588)4030720-7 (DE-627)104814403 (DE-576)208988815 Kirchengeschichte gnd, s (DE-588)4075933-7 (DE-627)104106484 (DE-576)209200200 Patristik gnd, (DE-627), Enthalten in Verbum et ecclesia Pretoria : Univ., 1995 40(2019), 1, Seite 1-14 Online-Ressource (DE-627)367636581 (DE-600)2116019-3 (DE-576)311829287 2074-7705 nnns, volume:40 year:2019 number:1 pages:1-14, https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v40i1.1959 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext, https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/1959 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext, https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/1959 LFER, LFER 2019-09-16T00:00:00Z |
spellingShingle |
Beukes, Johann, Policraticus en Metalogicon: ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018, Policraticus and Metalogicon: Updating the Saresberiensis-research, 2013-2018. This article provides an overview of the philosophical outputs of John of Salisbury (ca. 1115-1180), with reference to his two main philosophical texts, Policraticus and Metalogicon (both circulated in 1159). After presenting current research challenges in Medieval philosophy, Salisbury is presented as an example of a 'non-canonised' figure in Medieval philosophy; one who is throughly researched in his niche compartment, but remains unacknowledged in 'canonised' Medieval philosophy. Few introductions, readers and companions in the discipline give attention to 'non-canonical' thinkers such as Salisbury - yet when the niche research itself comes forward with a remarkable output in a short period of just five years, the 'canon' of Medieval philosophy itself could possibly be challenged. The niche research in Salisbury's case has indeed presented an energetic output over the past few years, which transcends the standardised sources and enriches the discipline. The question lingers: do these combined efforts have the ability to challenge the notion of a 'canonised' Medieval philosophy? Four contributions from the niche scholarship from 2013 to 2018 are henceforth discussed: i) A new translation of Metalogicon (Hall & Haseldine 2013); ii) A research-updated introduction (Grellard & Lachaud 2015), the first of its kind in Salisbury scholarship in more than three decades; iii) A monography (O' Daly 2018, overstating the own case contra Nederman, yet with a stunning Roman premise); and iv) The replacement of the complete Salisbury section in the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Bollermann and Nederman 2016).Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: As a millennium-long discourse, Medieval philosophy functions in a Venn diagrammatical relationship with Medieval history, Church history, patristics and philosophy of religion. Whenever 'mainstream' or 'canonised' Medieval philosophy is impacted from the niche research, it may well have implications that these closely related disciplines could take note of., Grellard & Lachaud 2015, Hall & Haseldine 2013, Irene O'Daly 2018, John of Salisbury, Metalogicon, Policraticus, Saresberiensis-Research, Johannes, Philosophie, Mittelalter, Kirchengeschichte, Patristik |
title |
Policraticus en Metalogicon: ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 |
title_auth |
Policraticus en Metalogicon ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 |
title_full |
Policraticus en Metalogicon ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 Johann Beukes |
title_fullStr |
Policraticus en Metalogicon ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 Johann Beukes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Policraticus en Metalogicon ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 Johann Beukes |
title_in_hierarchy |
Policraticus en Metalogicon: ? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 / Johann Beukes, |
title_short |
Policraticus en Metalogicon |
title_sort |
policraticus en metalogicon bywerking van die saresberiensis navorsing 2013 2018 |
title_sub |
? Bywerking van die Saresberiensis-navorsing, 2013-2018 |
topic |
Grellard & Lachaud 2015, Hall & Haseldine 2013, Irene O'Daly 2018, John of Salisbury, Metalogicon, Policraticus, Saresberiensis-Research, Johannes, Philosophie, Mittelalter, Kirchengeschichte, Patristik |
topic_facet |
Grellard & Lachaud 2015, Hall & Haseldine 2013, Irene O'Daly 2018, John of Salisbury, Metalogicon, Policraticus, Saresberiensis-Research, Johannes, Philosophie, Mittelalter, Kirchengeschichte, Patristik |
url |
https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v40i1.1959, https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/1959 |