Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | Vigiliae Christianae |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | Vigiliae Christianae, 57, 2003, 4, S. 389-410 |
Medientyp: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Unbestimmt |
veröffentlicht: |
Brill
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Scholten, Clemens Scholten, Clemens |
---|---|
author |
Scholten, Clemens |
spellingShingle |
Scholten, Clemens Vigiliae Christianae EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN Linguistics and Language History Language and Linguistics Cultural Studies Archeology Religious studies |
author_sort |
scholten, clemens |
spelling |
Scholten, Clemens 0042-6032 1570-0720 Brill Linguistics and Language History Language and Linguistics Cultural Studies Archeology Religious studies http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157007203772064577 <jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>There are traces of attempts at a methodical explanation of biblical texts before the appearance of full-scale commentaries on Holy Scripture. The use of exegetical technical forms arose in Christian schools from the necessity to understand the contents of the Bible as coherent. In Clement of Alexandria, exc. Theod. 4f, a hitherto overlooked fragment of an early Christian Quaestiones-commentary has been preserved. The specific interest in Christ's transfiguration concerns his identity with God and the comprehension of his disciples. The differences between heretical and orthodox exegesis do not depend on the choice of methods, as Marc the Magician and Clement demonstrate. The narrative of the transfiguration in the apocryphal Acts of the Apostles testifies to exegetical expertise. Origen considers his own scholarly exegesis as basically debatable.</jats:p> </jats:sec> EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN Vigiliae Christianae |
doi_str_mv |
10.1163/157007203772064577 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen Geschichte Allgemeines Theologie und Religionswissenschaft |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xNTcwMDcyMDM3NzIwNjQ1Nzc |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xNTcwMDcyMDM3NzIwNjQ1Nzc |
institution |
DE-D275 DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Zi4 DE-Gla1 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-14 DE-105 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 |
imprint |
Brill, 2003 |
imprint_str_mv |
Brill, 2003 |
issn |
0042-6032 1570-0720 |
issn_str_mv |
0042-6032 1570-0720 |
language |
Undetermined |
mega_collection |
Brill (CrossRef) |
match_str |
scholten2003einunerkannterquaestioneskommentarexctheod4funddiedeutungderverklarungchristiinfruhchristlichentexten |
publishDateSort |
2003 |
publisher |
Brill |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
Vigiliae Christianae |
source_id |
49 |
title |
EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_unstemmed |
EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_full |
EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_fullStr |
EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_full_unstemmed |
EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_short |
EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_sort |
ein unerkannter quaestioneskommentar (exc.theod. 4f) und die deutung der verklärung christi in frühchristlichen texten |
topic |
Linguistics and Language History Language and Linguistics Cultural Studies Archeology Religious studies |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157007203772064577 |
publishDate |
2003 |
physical |
389-410 |
description |
<jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>There are traces of attempts at a methodical explanation of biblical texts before the appearance of full-scale commentaries on Holy Scripture. The use of exegetical technical forms arose in Christian schools from the necessity to understand the contents of the Bible as coherent. In Clement of Alexandria, exc. Theod. 4f, a hitherto overlooked fragment of an early Christian Quaestiones-commentary has been preserved. The specific interest in Christ's transfiguration concerns his identity with God and the comprehension of his disciples. The differences between heretical and orthodox exegesis do not depend on the choice of methods, as Marc the Magician and Clement demonstrate. The narrative of the transfiguration in the apocryphal Acts of the Apostles testifies to exegetical expertise. Origen considers his own scholarly exegesis as basically debatable.</jats:p>
</jats:sec> |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
389 |
container_title |
Vigiliae Christianae |
container_volume |
57 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792328381739565060 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T12:52:23.749Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=EIN+UNERKANNTER+QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR+%28EXC.THEOD.+4F%29+UND+DIE+DEUTUNG+DER+VERKL%C3%84RUNG+CHRISTI+IN+FR%C3%9CHCHRISTLICHEN+TEXTEN&rft.date=2003-01-01&genre=article&issn=1570-0720&volume=57&issue=4&spage=389&epage=410&pages=389-410&jtitle=Vigiliae+Christianae&atitle=EIN+UNERKANNTER+QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR+%28EXC.THEOD.+4F%29+UND+DIE+DEUTUNG+DER+VERKL%C3%84RUNG+CHRISTI+IN+FR%C3%9CHCHRISTLICHEN+TEXTEN&aulast=Scholten&aufirst=Clemens&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1163%2F157007203772064577&rft.language%5B0%5D=und |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792328381739565060 |
author | Scholten, Clemens |
author_facet | Scholten, Clemens, Scholten, Clemens |
author_sort | scholten, clemens |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 389 |
container_title | Vigiliae Christianae |
container_volume | 57 |
description | <jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>There are traces of attempts at a methodical explanation of biblical texts before the appearance of full-scale commentaries on Holy Scripture. The use of exegetical technical forms arose in Christian schools from the necessity to understand the contents of the Bible as coherent. In Clement of Alexandria, exc. Theod. 4f, a hitherto overlooked fragment of an early Christian Quaestiones-commentary has been preserved. The specific interest in Christ's transfiguration concerns his identity with God and the comprehension of his disciples. The differences between heretical and orthodox exegesis do not depend on the choice of methods, as Marc the Magician and Clement demonstrate. The narrative of the transfiguration in the apocryphal Acts of the Apostles testifies to exegetical expertise. Origen considers his own scholarly exegesis as basically debatable.</jats:p> </jats:sec> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/157007203772064577 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen, Geschichte, Allgemeines, Theologie und Religionswissenschaft |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTE2My8xNTcwMDcyMDM3NzIwNjQ1Nzc |
imprint | Brill, 2003 |
imprint_str_mv | Brill, 2003 |
institution | DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Zi4, DE-Gla1, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-14, DE-105, DE-Ch1, DE-L229 |
issn | 0042-6032, 1570-0720 |
issn_str_mv | 0042-6032, 1570-0720 |
language | Undetermined |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T12:52:23.749Z |
match_str | scholten2003einunerkannterquaestioneskommentarexctheod4funddiedeutungderverklarungchristiinfruhchristlichentexten |
mega_collection | Brill (CrossRef) |
physical | 389-410 |
publishDate | 2003 |
publishDateSort | 2003 |
publisher | Brill |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | Vigiliae Christianae |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Scholten, Clemens 0042-6032 1570-0720 Brill Linguistics and Language History Language and Linguistics Cultural Studies Archeology Religious studies http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157007203772064577 <jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>There are traces of attempts at a methodical explanation of biblical texts before the appearance of full-scale commentaries on Holy Scripture. The use of exegetical technical forms arose in Christian schools from the necessity to understand the contents of the Bible as coherent. In Clement of Alexandria, exc. Theod. 4f, a hitherto overlooked fragment of an early Christian Quaestiones-commentary has been preserved. The specific interest in Christ's transfiguration concerns his identity with God and the comprehension of his disciples. The differences between heretical and orthodox exegesis do not depend on the choice of methods, as Marc the Magician and Clement demonstrate. The narrative of the transfiguration in the apocryphal Acts of the Apostles testifies to exegetical expertise. Origen considers his own scholarly exegesis as basically debatable.</jats:p> </jats:sec> EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN Vigiliae Christianae |
spellingShingle | Scholten, Clemens, Vigiliae Christianae, EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN, Linguistics and Language, History, Language and Linguistics, Cultural Studies, Archeology, Religious studies |
title | EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_full | EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_fullStr | EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_full_unstemmed | EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_short | EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
title_sort | ein unerkannter quaestioneskommentar (exc.theod. 4f) und die deutung der verklärung christi in frühchristlichen texten |
title_unstemmed | EIN UNERKANNTER QUAESTIONESKOMMENTAR (EXC.THEOD. 4F) UND DIE DEUTUNG DER VERKLÄRUNG CHRISTI IN FRÜHCHRISTLICHEN TEXTEN |
topic | Linguistics and Language, History, Language and Linguistics, Cultural Studies, Archeology, Religious studies |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157007203772064577 |