Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Buchumschlag von Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
Verfügbar über Online-Ressource
author_facet Nelson, Jacob A.
Pérez‐Priego, Oscar
Zhou, Sha
Poyatos, Rafael
Zhang, Yao
Blanken, Peter D.
Gimeno, Teresa E.
Wohlfahrt, Georg
Desai, Ankur R.
Gioli, Beniamino
Limousin, Jean‐Marc
Bonal, Damien
Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie
Scott, Russell L.
Varlagin, Andrej
Fuchs, Kathrin
Montagnani, Leonardo
Wolf, Sebastian
Delpierre, Nicolas
Berveiller, Daniel
Gharun, Mana
Belelli Marchesini, Luca
Gianelle, Damiano
Šigut, Ladislav
Mammarella, Ivan
Siebicke, Lukas
Andrew Black, T.
Knohl, Alexander
Hörtnagl, Lukas
Magliulo, Vincenzo
Besnard, Simon
Weber, Ulrich
Carvalhais, Nuno
Migliavacca, Mirco
Reichstein, Markus
Jung, Martin
Nelson, Jacob A.
Pérez‐Priego, Oscar
Zhou, Sha
Poyatos, Rafael
Zhang, Yao
Blanken, Peter D.
Gimeno, Teresa E.
Wohlfahrt, Georg
Desai, Ankur R.
Gioli, Beniamino
Limousin, Jean‐Marc
Bonal, Damien
Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie
Scott, Russell L.
Varlagin, Andrej
Fuchs, Kathrin
Montagnani, Leonardo
Wolf, Sebastian
Delpierre, Nicolas
Berveiller, Daniel
Gharun, Mana
Belelli Marchesini, Luca
Gianelle, Damiano
Šigut, Ladislav
Mammarella, Ivan
Siebicke, Lukas
Andrew Black, T.
Knohl, Alexander
Hörtnagl, Lukas
Magliulo, Vincenzo
Besnard, Simon
Weber, Ulrich
Carvalhais, Nuno
Migliavacca, Mirco
Reichstein, Markus
Jung, Martin
author Nelson, Jacob A.
Pérez‐Priego, Oscar
Zhou, Sha
Poyatos, Rafael
Zhang, Yao
Blanken, Peter D.
Gimeno, Teresa E.
Wohlfahrt, Georg
Desai, Ankur R.
Gioli, Beniamino
Limousin, Jean‐Marc
Bonal, Damien
Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie
Scott, Russell L.
Varlagin, Andrej
Fuchs, Kathrin
Montagnani, Leonardo
Wolf, Sebastian
Delpierre, Nicolas
Berveiller, Daniel
Gharun, Mana
Belelli Marchesini, Luca
Gianelle, Damiano
Šigut, Ladislav
Mammarella, Ivan
Siebicke, Lukas
Andrew Black, T.
Knohl, Alexander
Hörtnagl, Lukas
Magliulo, Vincenzo
Besnard, Simon
Weber, Ulrich
Carvalhais, Nuno
Migliavacca, Mirco
Reichstein, Markus
Jung, Martin
spellingShingle Nelson, Jacob A.
Pérez‐Priego, Oscar
Zhou, Sha
Poyatos, Rafael
Zhang, Yao
Blanken, Peter D.
Gimeno, Teresa E.
Wohlfahrt, Georg
Desai, Ankur R.
Gioli, Beniamino
Limousin, Jean‐Marc
Bonal, Damien
Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie
Scott, Russell L.
Varlagin, Andrej
Fuchs, Kathrin
Montagnani, Leonardo
Wolf, Sebastian
Delpierre, Nicolas
Berveiller, Daniel
Gharun, Mana
Belelli Marchesini, Luca
Gianelle, Damiano
Šigut, Ladislav
Mammarella, Ivan
Siebicke, Lukas
Andrew Black, T.
Knohl, Alexander
Hörtnagl, Lukas
Magliulo, Vincenzo
Besnard, Simon
Weber, Ulrich
Carvalhais, Nuno
Migliavacca, Mirco
Reichstein, Markus
Jung, Martin
Global Change Biology
Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
General Environmental Science
Ecology
Environmental Chemistry
Global and Planetary Change
author_sort nelson, jacob a.
spelling Nelson, Jacob A. Pérez‐Priego, Oscar Zhou, Sha Poyatos, Rafael Zhang, Yao Blanken, Peter D. Gimeno, Teresa E. Wohlfahrt, Georg Desai, Ankur R. Gioli, Beniamino Limousin, Jean‐Marc Bonal, Damien Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie Scott, Russell L. Varlagin, Andrej Fuchs, Kathrin Montagnani, Leonardo Wolf, Sebastian Delpierre, Nicolas Berveiller, Daniel Gharun, Mana Belelli Marchesini, Luca Gianelle, Damiano Šigut, Ladislav Mammarella, Ivan Siebicke, Lukas Andrew Black, T. Knohl, Alexander Hörtnagl, Lukas Magliulo, Vincenzo Besnard, Simon Weber, Ulrich Carvalhais, Nuno Migliavacca, Mirco Reichstein, Markus Jung, Martin 1354-1013 1365-2486 Wiley General Environmental Science Ecology Environmental Chemistry Global and Planetary Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15314 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We apply and compare three widely applicable methods for estimating ecosystem transpiration (<jats:italic>T</jats:italic>) from eddy covariance (EC) data across 251 FLUXNET sites globally. All three methods are based on the coupled water and carbon relationship, but they differ in assumptions and parameterizations. Intercomparison of the three daily <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates shows high correlation among methods (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> between .89 and .94), but a spread in magnitudes of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET (evapotranspiration) from 45% to 77%. When compared at six sites with concurrent EC and sap flow measurements, all three EC‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates show higher correlation to sap flow‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> than EC‐based ET. The partitioning methods show expected tendencies of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET increasing with dryness (vapor pressure deficit and days since rain) and with leaf area index (LAI). Analysis of 140 sites with high‐quality estimates for at least two continuous years shows that <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET variability was 1.6 times higher across sites than across years. Spatial variability of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET was primarily driven by vegetation and soil characteristics (e.g., crop or grass designation, minimum annual LAI, soil coarse fragment volume) rather than climatic variables such as mean/standard deviation of temperature or precipitation. Overall, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET patterns are plausible and qualitatively consistent among the different water flux partitioning methods implying a significant advance made for estimating and understanding <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> globally, while the magnitudes remain uncertain. Our results represent the first extensive EC data‐based estimates of ecosystem <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> permitting a data‐driven perspective on the role of plants’ water use for global water and carbon cycling in a changing climate.</jats:p> Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites Global Change Biology
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.15314
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geographie
Technik
Chemie und Pharmazie
Geologie und Paläontologie
Physik
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9nY2IuMTUzMTQ
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9nY2IuMTUzMTQ
institution DE-105
DE-14
DE-Ch1
DE-L229
DE-D275
DE-Bn3
DE-Brt1
DE-D161
DE-Gla1
DE-Zi4
DE-15
DE-Pl11
DE-Rs1
imprint Wiley, 2020
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2020
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
issn_str_mv 1354-1013
1365-2486
language English
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
match_str nelson2020ecosystemtranspirationandevaporationinsightsfromthreewaterfluxpartitioningmethodsacrossfluxnetsites
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Wiley
recordtype ai
record_format ai
series Global Change Biology
source_id 49
title Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_unstemmed Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_full Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_fullStr Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_short Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_sort ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: insights from three water flux partitioning methods across fluxnet sites
topic General Environmental Science
Ecology
Environmental Chemistry
Global and Planetary Change
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15314
publishDate 2020
physical 6916-6930
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We apply and compare three widely applicable methods for estimating ecosystem transpiration (<jats:italic>T</jats:italic>) from eddy covariance (EC) data across 251 FLUXNET sites globally. All three methods are based on the coupled water and carbon relationship, but they differ in assumptions and parameterizations. Intercomparison of the three daily <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates shows high correlation among methods (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> between .89 and .94), but a spread in magnitudes of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET (evapotranspiration) from 45% to 77%. When compared at six sites with concurrent EC and sap flow measurements, all three EC‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates show higher correlation to sap flow‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> than EC‐based ET. The partitioning methods show expected tendencies of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET increasing with dryness (vapor pressure deficit and days since rain) and with leaf area index (LAI). Analysis of 140 sites with high‐quality estimates for at least two continuous years shows that <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET variability was 1.6 times higher across sites than across years. Spatial variability of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET was primarily driven by vegetation and soil characteristics (e.g., crop or grass designation, minimum annual LAI, soil coarse fragment volume) rather than climatic variables such as mean/standard deviation of temperature or precipitation. Overall, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET patterns are plausible and qualitatively consistent among the different water flux partitioning methods implying a significant advance made for estimating and understanding <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> globally, while the magnitudes remain uncertain. Our results represent the first extensive EC data‐based estimates of ecosystem <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> permitting a data‐driven perspective on the role of plants’ water use for global water and carbon cycling in a changing climate.</jats:p>
container_issue 12
container_start_page 6916
container_title Global Change Biology
container_volume 26
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1792347619667738626
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:57:33.472Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Ecosystem+transpiration+and+evaporation%3A+Insights+from+three+water+flux+partitioning+methods+across+FLUXNET+sites&rft.date=2020-12-01&genre=article&issn=1365-2486&volume=26&issue=12&spage=6916&epage=6930&pages=6916-6930&jtitle=Global+Change+Biology&atitle=Ecosystem+transpiration+and+evaporation%3A+Insights+from+three+water+flux+partitioning+methods+across+FLUXNET+sites&aulast=Jung&aufirst=Martin&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1111%2Fgcb.15314&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1792347619667738626
author Nelson, Jacob A., Pérez‐Priego, Oscar, Zhou, Sha, Poyatos, Rafael, Zhang, Yao, Blanken, Peter D., Gimeno, Teresa E., Wohlfahrt, Georg, Desai, Ankur R., Gioli, Beniamino, Limousin, Jean‐Marc, Bonal, Damien, Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie, Scott, Russell L., Varlagin, Andrej, Fuchs, Kathrin, Montagnani, Leonardo, Wolf, Sebastian, Delpierre, Nicolas, Berveiller, Daniel, Gharun, Mana, Belelli Marchesini, Luca, Gianelle, Damiano, Šigut, Ladislav, Mammarella, Ivan, Siebicke, Lukas, Andrew Black, T., Knohl, Alexander, Hörtnagl, Lukas, Magliulo, Vincenzo, Besnard, Simon, Weber, Ulrich, Carvalhais, Nuno, Migliavacca, Mirco, Reichstein, Markus, Jung, Martin
author_facet Nelson, Jacob A., Pérez‐Priego, Oscar, Zhou, Sha, Poyatos, Rafael, Zhang, Yao, Blanken, Peter D., Gimeno, Teresa E., Wohlfahrt, Georg, Desai, Ankur R., Gioli, Beniamino, Limousin, Jean‐Marc, Bonal, Damien, Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie, Scott, Russell L., Varlagin, Andrej, Fuchs, Kathrin, Montagnani, Leonardo, Wolf, Sebastian, Delpierre, Nicolas, Berveiller, Daniel, Gharun, Mana, Belelli Marchesini, Luca, Gianelle, Damiano, Šigut, Ladislav, Mammarella, Ivan, Siebicke, Lukas, Andrew Black, T., Knohl, Alexander, Hörtnagl, Lukas, Magliulo, Vincenzo, Besnard, Simon, Weber, Ulrich, Carvalhais, Nuno, Migliavacca, Mirco, Reichstein, Markus, Jung, Martin, Nelson, Jacob A., Pérez‐Priego, Oscar, Zhou, Sha, Poyatos, Rafael, Zhang, Yao, Blanken, Peter D., Gimeno, Teresa E., Wohlfahrt, Georg, Desai, Ankur R., Gioli, Beniamino, Limousin, Jean‐Marc, Bonal, Damien, Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie, Scott, Russell L., Varlagin, Andrej, Fuchs, Kathrin, Montagnani, Leonardo, Wolf, Sebastian, Delpierre, Nicolas, Berveiller, Daniel, Gharun, Mana, Belelli Marchesini, Luca, Gianelle, Damiano, Šigut, Ladislav, Mammarella, Ivan, Siebicke, Lukas, Andrew Black, T., Knohl, Alexander, Hörtnagl, Lukas, Magliulo, Vincenzo, Besnard, Simon, Weber, Ulrich, Carvalhais, Nuno, Migliavacca, Mirco, Reichstein, Markus, Jung, Martin
author_sort nelson, jacob a.
container_issue 12
container_start_page 6916
container_title Global Change Biology
container_volume 26
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We apply and compare three widely applicable methods for estimating ecosystem transpiration (<jats:italic>T</jats:italic>) from eddy covariance (EC) data across 251 FLUXNET sites globally. All three methods are based on the coupled water and carbon relationship, but they differ in assumptions and parameterizations. Intercomparison of the three daily <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates shows high correlation among methods (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> between .89 and .94), but a spread in magnitudes of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET (evapotranspiration) from 45% to 77%. When compared at six sites with concurrent EC and sap flow measurements, all three EC‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates show higher correlation to sap flow‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> than EC‐based ET. The partitioning methods show expected tendencies of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET increasing with dryness (vapor pressure deficit and days since rain) and with leaf area index (LAI). Analysis of 140 sites with high‐quality estimates for at least two continuous years shows that <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET variability was 1.6 times higher across sites than across years. Spatial variability of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET was primarily driven by vegetation and soil characteristics (e.g., crop or grass designation, minimum annual LAI, soil coarse fragment volume) rather than climatic variables such as mean/standard deviation of temperature or precipitation. Overall, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET patterns are plausible and qualitatively consistent among the different water flux partitioning methods implying a significant advance made for estimating and understanding <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> globally, while the magnitudes remain uncertain. Our results represent the first extensive EC data‐based estimates of ecosystem <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> permitting a data‐driven perspective on the role of plants’ water use for global water and carbon cycling in a changing climate.</jats:p>
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.15314
facet_avail Online
finc_class_facet Geographie, Technik, Chemie und Pharmazie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Physik
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTExMS9nY2IuMTUzMTQ
imprint Wiley, 2020
imprint_str_mv Wiley, 2020
institution DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275, DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1
issn 1354-1013, 1365-2486
issn_str_mv 1354-1013, 1365-2486
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-01T17:57:33.472Z
match_str nelson2020ecosystemtranspirationandevaporationinsightsfromthreewaterfluxpartitioningmethodsacrossfluxnetsites
mega_collection Wiley (CrossRef)
physical 6916-6930
publishDate 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Wiley
record_format ai
recordtype ai
series Global Change Biology
source_id 49
spelling Nelson, Jacob A. Pérez‐Priego, Oscar Zhou, Sha Poyatos, Rafael Zhang, Yao Blanken, Peter D. Gimeno, Teresa E. Wohlfahrt, Georg Desai, Ankur R. Gioli, Beniamino Limousin, Jean‐Marc Bonal, Damien Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie Scott, Russell L. Varlagin, Andrej Fuchs, Kathrin Montagnani, Leonardo Wolf, Sebastian Delpierre, Nicolas Berveiller, Daniel Gharun, Mana Belelli Marchesini, Luca Gianelle, Damiano Šigut, Ladislav Mammarella, Ivan Siebicke, Lukas Andrew Black, T. Knohl, Alexander Hörtnagl, Lukas Magliulo, Vincenzo Besnard, Simon Weber, Ulrich Carvalhais, Nuno Migliavacca, Mirco Reichstein, Markus Jung, Martin 1354-1013 1365-2486 Wiley General Environmental Science Ecology Environmental Chemistry Global and Planetary Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15314 <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We apply and compare three widely applicable methods for estimating ecosystem transpiration (<jats:italic>T</jats:italic>) from eddy covariance (EC) data across 251 FLUXNET sites globally. All three methods are based on the coupled water and carbon relationship, but they differ in assumptions and parameterizations. Intercomparison of the three daily <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates shows high correlation among methods (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic> between .89 and .94), but a spread in magnitudes of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET (evapotranspiration) from 45% to 77%. When compared at six sites with concurrent EC and sap flow measurements, all three EC‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> estimates show higher correlation to sap flow‐based <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> than EC‐based ET. The partitioning methods show expected tendencies of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET increasing with dryness (vapor pressure deficit and days since rain) and with leaf area index (LAI). Analysis of 140 sites with high‐quality estimates for at least two continuous years shows that <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET variability was 1.6 times higher across sites than across years. Spatial variability of <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET was primarily driven by vegetation and soil characteristics (e.g., crop or grass designation, minimum annual LAI, soil coarse fragment volume) rather than climatic variables such as mean/standard deviation of temperature or precipitation. Overall, <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>/ET patterns are plausible and qualitatively consistent among the different water flux partitioning methods implying a significant advance made for estimating and understanding <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> globally, while the magnitudes remain uncertain. Our results represent the first extensive EC data‐based estimates of ecosystem <jats:italic>T</jats:italic> permitting a data‐driven perspective on the role of plants’ water use for global water and carbon cycling in a changing climate.</jats:p> Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites Global Change Biology
spellingShingle Nelson, Jacob A., Pérez‐Priego, Oscar, Zhou, Sha, Poyatos, Rafael, Zhang, Yao, Blanken, Peter D., Gimeno, Teresa E., Wohlfahrt, Georg, Desai, Ankur R., Gioli, Beniamino, Limousin, Jean‐Marc, Bonal, Damien, Paul‐Limoges, Eugénie, Scott, Russell L., Varlagin, Andrej, Fuchs, Kathrin, Montagnani, Leonardo, Wolf, Sebastian, Delpierre, Nicolas, Berveiller, Daniel, Gharun, Mana, Belelli Marchesini, Luca, Gianelle, Damiano, Šigut, Ladislav, Mammarella, Ivan, Siebicke, Lukas, Andrew Black, T., Knohl, Alexander, Hörtnagl, Lukas, Magliulo, Vincenzo, Besnard, Simon, Weber, Ulrich, Carvalhais, Nuno, Migliavacca, Mirco, Reichstein, Markus, Jung, Martin, Global Change Biology, Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites, General Environmental Science, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change
title Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_full Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_fullStr Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_short Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
title_sort ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: insights from three water flux partitioning methods across fluxnet sites
title_unstemmed Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites
topic General Environmental Science, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15314