Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Pots and Pisistratan propaganda
Gespeichert in:
Zeitschriftentitel: | The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
---|---|
Personen und Körperschaften: | |
In: | The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 107, 1987, S. 167-169 |
Medientyp: | E-Article |
Sprache: | Englisch |
veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
|
Schlagwörter: |
author_facet |
Cook, R. M. Cook, R. M. |
---|---|
author |
Cook, R. M. |
spellingShingle |
Cook, R. M. The Journal of Hellenic Studies Pots and Pisistratan propaganda Literature and Literary Theory Linguistics and Language Archeology Visual Arts and Performing Arts Language and Linguistics Archeology Classics |
author_sort |
cook, r. m. |
spelling |
Cook, R. M. 0075-4269 2041-4099 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Literature and Literary Theory Linguistics and Language Archeology Visual Arts and Performing Arts Language and Linguistics Archeology Classics http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/630078 <jats:p>It has become fashionable to discover political allusions in subjects painted on Attic pottery of the Archaic period. These allusions are of two kinds, not always clearly distinguished. One is deliberate party propaganda, especially for or against Pisistratus or his sons. The other, which reflects results of political action, need not have political intent: Theseus, for instance, was becoming more popular in Athens by the end of the sixth century, with official encouragement it seems, and his more frequent representation in art may be due simply to that popularity. Here I am concerned only with partisan propaganda, and particularly that concerning Pisistratus and his equation with Heracles. Though the propagandist theory has by now quite a literature, it is surprising that there has been little objection, at least in print.</jats:p> Pots and Pisistratan propaganda The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
doi_str_mv |
10.2307/630078 |
facet_avail |
Online |
finc_class_facet |
Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen Kunst und Kunstgeschichte Philosophie Klassische Philologie |
format |
ElectronicArticle |
fullrecord |
blob:ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjMwNy82MzAwNzg |
id |
ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjMwNy82MzAwNzg |
institution |
DE-Bn3 DE-Brt1 DE-D161 DE-Gla1 DE-Zi4 DE-15 DE-Pl11 DE-Rs1 DE-105 DE-14 DE-Ch1 DE-L229 DE-D275 |
imprint |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
imprint_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
issn |
0075-4269 2041-4099 |
issn_str_mv |
0075-4269 2041-4099 |
language |
English |
mega_collection |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
match_str |
cook1987potsandpisistratanpropaganda |
publishDateSort |
1987 |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
recordtype |
ai |
record_format |
ai |
series |
The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
source_id |
49 |
title |
Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_unstemmed |
Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_full |
Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_fullStr |
Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_short |
Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_sort |
pots and pisistratan propaganda |
topic |
Literature and Literary Theory Linguistics and Language Archeology Visual Arts and Performing Arts Language and Linguistics Archeology Classics |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/630078 |
publishDate |
1987 |
physical |
167-169 |
description |
<jats:p>It has become fashionable to discover political allusions in subjects painted on Attic pottery of the Archaic period. These allusions are of two kinds, not always clearly distinguished. One is deliberate party propaganda, especially for or against Pisistratus or his sons. The other, which reflects results of political action, need not have political intent: Theseus, for instance, was becoming more popular in Athens by the end of the sixth century, with official encouragement it seems, and his more frequent representation in art may be due simply to that popularity. Here I am concerned only with partisan propaganda, and particularly that concerning Pisistratus and his equation with Heracles. Though the propagandist theory has by now quite a literature, it is surprising that there has been little objection, at least in print.</jats:p> |
container_start_page |
167 |
container_title |
The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
container_volume |
107 |
format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 |
E-Article |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 |
Article |
format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
_version_ |
1792336402954846222 |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
last_indexed |
2024-03-01T14:59:53.696Z |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Pots+and+Pisistratan+propaganda&rft.date=1987-11-01&genre=article&issn=2041-4099&volume=107&spage=167&epage=169&pages=167-169&jtitle=The+Journal+of+Hellenic+Studies&atitle=Pots+and+Pisistratan+propaganda&aulast=Cook&aufirst=R.+M.&rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.2307%2F630078&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
SOLR | |
_version_ | 1792336402954846222 |
author | Cook, R. M. |
author_facet | Cook, R. M., Cook, R. M. |
author_sort | cook, r. m. |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
container_volume | 107 |
description | <jats:p>It has become fashionable to discover political allusions in subjects painted on Attic pottery of the Archaic period. These allusions are of two kinds, not always clearly distinguished. One is deliberate party propaganda, especially for or against Pisistratus or his sons. The other, which reflects results of political action, need not have political intent: Theseus, for instance, was becoming more popular in Athens by the end of the sixth century, with official encouragement it seems, and his more frequent representation in art may be due simply to that popularity. Here I am concerned only with partisan propaganda, and particularly that concerning Pisistratus and his equation with Heracles. Though the propagandist theory has by now quite a literature, it is surprising that there has been little objection, at least in print.</jats:p> |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/630078 |
facet_avail | Online |
finc_class_facet | Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Indogermanistik, Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen, Kunst und Kunstgeschichte, Philosophie, Klassische Philologie |
format | ElectronicArticle |
format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
format_degla1 | E-Article |
format_del152 | Buch |
format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
format_dezi4 | Article |
format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
format_finc | Article, E-Article |
format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
geogr_code | not assigned |
geogr_code_person | not assigned |
id | ai-49-aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMjMwNy82MzAwNzg |
imprint | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1987 |
institution | DE-Bn3, DE-Brt1, DE-D161, DE-Gla1, DE-Zi4, DE-15, DE-Pl11, DE-Rs1, DE-105, DE-14, DE-Ch1, DE-L229, DE-D275 |
issn | 0075-4269, 2041-4099 |
issn_str_mv | 0075-4269, 2041-4099 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-01T14:59:53.696Z |
match_str | cook1987potsandpisistratanpropaganda |
mega_collection | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (CrossRef) |
physical | 167-169 |
publishDate | 1987 |
publishDateSort | 1987 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
record_format | ai |
recordtype | ai |
series | The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
source_id | 49 |
spelling | Cook, R. M. 0075-4269 2041-4099 Cambridge University Press (CUP) Literature and Literary Theory Linguistics and Language Archeology Visual Arts and Performing Arts Language and Linguistics Archeology Classics http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/630078 <jats:p>It has become fashionable to discover political allusions in subjects painted on Attic pottery of the Archaic period. These allusions are of two kinds, not always clearly distinguished. One is deliberate party propaganda, especially for or against Pisistratus or his sons. The other, which reflects results of political action, need not have political intent: Theseus, for instance, was becoming more popular in Athens by the end of the sixth century, with official encouragement it seems, and his more frequent representation in art may be due simply to that popularity. Here I am concerned only with partisan propaganda, and particularly that concerning Pisistratus and his equation with Heracles. Though the propagandist theory has by now quite a literature, it is surprising that there has been little objection, at least in print.</jats:p> Pots and Pisistratan propaganda The Journal of Hellenic Studies |
spellingShingle | Cook, R. M., The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Pots and Pisistratan propaganda, Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language, Archeology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Language and Linguistics, Archeology, Classics |
title | Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_full | Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_fullStr | Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_short | Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
title_sort | pots and pisistratan propaganda |
title_unstemmed | Pots and Pisistratan propaganda |
topic | Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language, Archeology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Language and Linguistics, Archeology, Classics |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/630078 |